Benedict Cumberbatch Reminds You to Be Terrified of Social Media in the Trailer for 'Brexit'

Benedict Cumberbatch Reminds You to Be Terrified of Social Media in the Trailer for 'Brexit'

брексит история

Birmingham (UK), 2016 (Ser. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics). P. 2. In 2016, as part of Palgrave Pivot series — which allows for speedy dissemination of medium-size studies (around the length of three to six standard journal articles) a book on an important and sensitive topic, both for British and for brexit news world politics, was published in the UK. Its author, the British researcher, the senior lecturer of the chair of politics and international relations of Aston University, A. Glenkross prepared substantial, but not deprived of flaws the research within short limits of time. His book consists of six chapters.

Other commentators

In the fifth chapter “The unfinished business of Brexit” consequences of voting for leaving EU are considered. The author analyzes two most challenging issues for the Great Britain. First, how to preserve access брексит новости to privileged trading terms with the Common Market, while not being a member of EU. Second, how to preserve Britain as a single state as Scotland did not vote to leave the EU and did not want to leave the EU34.

In the fourth chapter “The EU Referendum Campaign” the author characterizes D. Cameron’s tactic which proved to be effective in 1975 referendum. At that time the British government emphasized economic gains from EEC membership. However, in the new conditions to the UK in 2016 the tactic proved to be “the great miscalculation”. Despite the fact that polls demonstrated positive attitudes of voters towards staying in a reformed EU, the government misjudged the public mood regarding both immigration and trust in ruling elites.

The vote revealed disagreements among British citizens. According to D.

Therefore, Britain could confirm its special status in the EU. As follows from the book, one of the main issues — migration from the EU countries, which displeased Eurosceptics, has been partially settled. As a consequence, the Great Britain would have become less attractive to emigration (due to reduction of social benefits and grants for “recent immigrants”). The pledges of the European Counsel not to apply to the Great Britain the statement of EU movement to ever-closer union should be attributed to D. Cameron’s achievements31.

Mexican Family Names Newborn After ‘Brexit’

  • The reason for Britain to vote on EU membership, as A.
  • But reticence of the French President’s to discuss Brexit is not attributed to ideological hostility by the author.
  • In conclusion the author summarizes that David Cameron’s gamble proved a great miscalculation with bad consequences for the UK domestic as well as foreign policy in the near future.
  • The author, contradicting his own statements regarding D.
  • Gove and Johnson are shown as having some reticence over specific Vote Leave claims (e.g. £350 million for NHS, and 70 million potential Turkish emigrants) but are seen to overcome them.
  • A. Glenkross assumes that D.

The author, contradicting his own statements regarding D. Cameron’s great miscalculation by calling for a new vote on EU, which resulted in the decision for the Great Britain to leave the EU, writes that “the Britain’s political economy also makes it stand out”. He argues as follows.

A. Glenkross analyzes in every detail the circumstances which have compelled the British Prime Minister D. Cameron to put a question of EU membership on vote. The reason for Britain to vote on EU membership, as A. Glenkross states, was the 2015 UK General Election that “set брексит история the stage for this momentous decision. For despite heralding a return to one-party majority government, that election revealed a country torn between exceptionalist identity claims”2. 1 Glencross A. Why the UK Voted for Brexit. David Cameron’s Great Miscalculation.

Unlike the majority of other researchers who considered mainly the social reasons of Brexit, A. Glenkross addresses political issues. Such as the renegotiation of the terms of British membership that preceded the vote on EU membership; the reasons which led to defeat of D. Cameron’s government strategy and reflection on the “political philosophy of Brexit”. Cummings meets and hires Canadian Zack Massingham, co-founder of AggregateIQ, who offers to build a database using social media tools of voters who are not on the UK electoral register but are inclined to vote to leave. Even during these Brexit negotiations, the key players Junker; Barnier; Tusk are unelected making decisions over people who have never given permission for them to make policy on their behalf.

Nevertheless, this work succeeds in carrying through a coherent message that combines interesting facts and conclusions, which could serve as a starting point for further research of integration processes in EU as well as political processes in Britain which resulted in the vote for Brexit. In the final stages, high-profile senior Tory MPs Michael Gove and Boris Johnson join the Vote Leave campaign emphasising the need to “Take Back Control”, while Penny Mordaunt is shown on BBC raising concerns over the accession of Turkey. Gove and Johnson are shown as having some reticence over specific Vote Leave claims (e.g. £350 million for NHS, and 70 million potential Turkish emigrants) but are seen to overcome them. Recent polls reflect that the vast majority of English people would gladly be rid of the Northern Irish issue and few of us have any issue with that province re-joining Southern Ireland.

The president of European Counsel Jean-Claude Junker has confirmed that “the concept of ever-closer union allows for different paths of integration for different countries”32. The grudging acceptance that a unilateral opt-out from unwanted single market legislation is impossible explains why getting the EU to focus on economic competitiveness was another Cameron priority. The UK government went into the renegotiation harbouring a legitimate concern that the Eurozone may act as a block within the EU, using its majority in the EU Council to pass laws, primarily for its own interests. As a result, financial regulations could be imposed on the City making it less globally competitive, thereby hurting a key UK economic interest. Lastly, there were the demands surrounding individual rights.

One of the benefits of work is that the author, among big number of referendums which took place in other EU countries on the European policy (about 50), managed to reveal the novelty of the British approach. A.

брексит история